Penerimaan Sistem Peringatan Dini Tsunami oleh Masyarakat Pesisir Melalui Integrasi Variabel Kontekstual dalam Model TAM

Annas Setiawan Prabowo; Andesita Prihantara; Nur Wahyu Rahadi; Isa Bahroni

doi:10.56211/blendsains.v4i3.1374

Authors

Annas Setiawan Prabowo Politeknik Negeri Cilacap, Cilacap
Andesita Prihantara Politeknik Negeri Cilacap, Cilacap
Nur Wahyu Rahadi Politeknik Negeri Cilacap, Cilacap
Isa Bahroni Politeknik Negeri Cilacap, Cilacap

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56211/blendsains.v4i3.1374

Keywords:

Sistem Peringatan Dini; Tsunami; TAM; Pesisir Selatan Jawa; EWS

Abstract

Kabupaten Cilacap yang terletak di Pesisisr selatan Pulau Jawa merupakan wilayah strategis dengan berbagai aktivitas kelautan dan perikaanan yang tinggi, namun dibalik potensi yang besar memilik tingkat akerentanan yang besar juga tentang ancaman Tsunami. Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika telah mengembangkan Early Warning System (EWS) berupa Sistem Peringatan Dini Tsunami sebagai salah satu kegiatan pemerintah untuk mengurangi dampak resiko bencana tsunami. Infrastruktur dan teknologi sudah dibuat, namun tingkat adopsi system oleh masyarakat pesisir masih tergolong rendah. Hal tersebut menunjukkan bahwa ada kesenjangan antara perilaku penerimaan teknologi dengan ketersediaan teknologi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui faktor pengaruh penerimaan masyarakat pesisir Cilacap terhadap sistem peringatan dini Tsunami melalui model TAM dengan integrasi variable kontenstual yaitu trust, experience dan subjective norm. Pendekatan kuantitatif dilakukan dengan mengambil data menggunakan kuesioner serta pengukuran dengan skala likert kepada masyarakat pesisir Cilacap serta dianalisisi menggunakan Structural Equation Modeling. Hasil penelitian menemukan Perceived Ease of Use berpengaruh positif terhadap Perceived Usefulness dengan nilai koefisien 0,470, Perceived Usefulness berpengaruh positif terhadap Behavioral Intention to Use dengan nilai koefisien 0,396, dan Trust berpengaruh langsung terhadap Behavioral Intention to Use dengan nilai koefisien 0,422. Temuan ini menunjukkan penerimaan teknologi penerimaan dini tsunami dipengaruhi oleh persepsi manfaat dan tingkat kepercayaan terhadap penyedia layanan teknologi.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. J. Ammon, H. Kanamori, T. Lay, and A. A. Velasco, “The 17 July 2006 Java tsunami earthquake,” Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 33, no. 24, Dec. 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028005

Pingky Marsella Effendie, “Warga Cilacap Gelar Simulasi Megathrust di Malam Hari.” Accessed: Nov. 12, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://cilacapkab.go.id/v3/warga-cilacap-gelar-simulasi-megathrust-di-malam-hari/

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

E. Suharini, Supriyadi, M. Syifauddin, E. T. Al-Hanif, E. Kurniawan, and S. B. Nugraha, “An Evaluation of Community Adoption of the InaRISK BNPB Platform for Disaster Management: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 673–684, 2023, doi: 10.18280/ijsse.130409.

A. Kurniasih, J. Marin, and R. Setyawan, “Belajar dari Simeulue: Memahami Sistem Peringatan Dini Tsunami di Indonesia,” Jurnal Geosains dan Teknologi, vol. 3, no. 1, Mar. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jgt.3.1.2020.21-30

E. Rizal, Y. Winoto, T. Sugito, C. Nugroho, and F. I. Septian, “Disaster communication in the digital age: a community-based case study of media, education, and local knowledge in Pangandaran, Indonesia,” Front. Commun. (Lausanne)., vol. 10, Oct. 2025, doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1632436

3389/fcomm.2025.1632436.

“Indonesia’s Early Warning System.” Accessed: Nov. 12, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://theaseanmagazine.asean.org/article/indonesias-early-warning-system/#:~:text=At%20the%20national%20level%2C%20right,more%20reliable%2C%20timely%2C%20and%20accurate

F. Nugroho, A. Falah Farhan, N. Prasetiyo Jurusan Teknik Geomatika, F. Teknologi Mineral, and J. Tambak Bayan No, “PEMBUATAN STORY MAPS PETA KERAWANAN TSUNAMI DAN RANCANGAN JALUR EVAKUASI DI PESISIR PANTAI KABUPATEN BANTUL,” Elipsoida : Jurnal Geodesi dan Geomatika, vol. 7, no. 1, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/elipsoida.2024.23011.

T. Adventari et al., “PENJALARAN TSUNAMI MENUJU KE OUTLET ARLINDO BERDASARKAN SKENARIO GEMPA MEGATHRUST SELATAN JAWA,” Jurnal Chart Datum, vol. 7, no. 1, Jul. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.37875/chartdatum.v7i1.205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37875/chartdatum.v7i1.205

Å. Davidsson, “Framework for evaluating the maintenance of a Tsunami Early Warning System (TEWS)–A pilot case study in Patong, Thailand, of social and technical quality indicators,” Cogent Eng., vol. 10, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311916.2023.2245586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2245586

N. Dias, R. Haigh, D. Amaratunga, and H. Rahayu, “A review of tsunami early warning at the local level: Key actors, dissemination pathways, and remaining challenges,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4480773

I. G. Prihanto, H. Gunawan, B. Riyanto, and W. Prasetio, “A technology acceptance model of satellite-based hydrometeorological hazards early warning system in Indonesia: An extended technology acceptance model,” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2374880, 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2374880.

W. Utariningsih, V. Novalia, and T. Saifullah, “Mitigation and community preparedness in anticipating tsunami disasters in Muara Batu, Aceh,” Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v15i1.1542

I. G. Prihanto et al., “A technology acceptance model of satellite-based hydrometeorological hazards early warning system in Indonesia: an-extended technology acceptance model,” Cogent Business and Management, vol. 11, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2374880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2374880

A. Mills, N. Todorova, and J. Zhang, “The role of threat and coping appraisals in motivating the use of personalised mobile emergency alert systems,” Information Technology and People, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1208–1229, 2025, doi: 10.1108/ITP-04-2021-0297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2021-0297

Z. Y. Min, K. Bhaktikul, S. Aroonsrimorakot, S. Sucharitakul, A. S. Tabucanon, and B. E. Siswoyo, “Factors related to coastal communities’ water-related natural disaster awareness, preparedness, resilience and recovery in three cyclone nargis affected areas in the ayeyarwaddy delta region, Myanmar,” Environ. Nat. Resour. J., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 304–313, 2020, doi: 10.32526/ennrj.18.3.2020.29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32526/ennrj.18.3.2020.29

E. Suharini, M. Syifauddin, E. T. Al-Hanif, E. Kurniawan, and S. Nugraha, “An Evaluation of Community Adoption of the InaRISK BNPB Platform for Disaster Management: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 673–684, 2023, doi: 10.18280/ijsse.130409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.130409

W. Wicaksono, I. Desportes, and J. Sopaheluwakan, “Disaster cultures and the Indonesia Tsunami Early Warning System: (mis) alignments revealed by the 2018 non-tectonic tsunami in Labuan,” Australian Journal of Emergency Management, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 34–40, 2024, doi: 10.47389/39.1.34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47389/39.1.34

M. R. S. Wardhana, A. Rahman, R. S. Oktari, and Y. Nishi, “Role of religious leaders as disaster risk communicators: a study in Peukan Bada District-Aceh,” in E3S Web of Conferences, 2023. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202346409004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346409004

F. Makinoshima, Y. Oishi, and F. Imamura, “Mechanism of an evacuation cascade during the 2011 Tohoku tsunami inferred from an evacuation simulation incorporating communications in social networks,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 71, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102810

P. Villagra and C. Quintana, “Disaster governance for community resilience in coastal towns: Chilean case studies,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 14, no. 9, 2017, doi: 10.3390/ijerph14091063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14091063

P. E. Carter, J. B. Thatcher, K. M. Chudoba, and K. Marett, “Post-acceptance intentions and behaviors: An empirical investigation of information technology use and innovation,” Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2012, doi: 10.4018/joeuc.2012010101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2012010101

F. Liu, O. Dedehayir, and B. Katzy, “Coalition formation during technology adoption,” Behaviour and Information Technology, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1186–1199, 2015, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2015.1046929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1046929

R. Prasanna and T. J. Huggins, “Factors affecting the acceptance of information systems supporting emergency operations centres,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 57, pp. 168–181, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.013

S. Hall et al., “Perceptions of tsunami susceptibility and self-efficacy among adolescents in Indonesia: The influence of gender, religion, location, age, hazard information source, and past experience,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 79, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103151

B. Kaulu, G. Kaulu, and P. Chilongo, “Factors influencing customers’ intention to adopt e-banking: a TAM and cybercrime perspective using structural equation modelling,” Journal of Money and Business, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 38–53, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1108/jmb-01-2024-0007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMB-01-2024-0007

T. T. Linh and N. T. T. Huyen, “An extension of Trust and TAM model with TPB in the adoption of digital payment: An empirical study in Vietnam,” F1000Res., vol. 14, p. 127, 2025, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.157763.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.157763.2

Y. Chen, S. K. Khan, N. Shiwakoti, P. Stasinopoulos, and K. Aghabayk, “Analysis of Australian Public Acceptance of Fully Automated Vehicles by Extending Technology Acceptance Model,” Case Stud. Transp. Policy, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101072

P. Sakuljao, W. Satiennam, T. Satiennam, N. Kronprasert, and S. Jaensirisak, “Understanding Intention to Use Conditionally Automated Vehicles in Thailand, Based on an Extended Technology Acceptance Model,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 1868, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15031868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031868

S. Pan, S. Jung, and S. Suo, “Understanding the Adoption and Usage Behaviors of Popular and Emerging Metaverse Platforms: A Study Based on the Extended Technology Acceptance Model,” J. Broadcast. Electron. Media, pp. 1–22, 2023, doi: 10.1080/08838151.2023.2224477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2023.2224477

M. S. Rosli, N. S. Saleh, A. Md. Ali, S. A. Bakar, and L. M. Tahir, “A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model for the Sustainability of Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Identified Research Gaps,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 18, p. 11389, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su141811389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811389

T. Dirsehan and L. van Zoonen, “Smart city technologies from the perspective of technology acceptance,” IET smart cities, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 197–210, 2022, doi: 10.1049/smc2.12040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/smc2.12040

A. Valencia-Arías et al., “Research trends in mobile payment adoption: Research trends and agenda,” F1000Res., vol. 14, p. 358, 2025, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.159551.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.159551.1

M. B. Garcia, “Factors Affecting Adoption Intention of Productivity Software Applications Among Teachers: A Structural Equation Modeling Investigation,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., pp. 1–14, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2022.2163565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2163565

A. E. O. Smith, C. Doidge, F. Lovatt, and J. Kaler, “Methods to develop and evaluate attitudinal scales to measure farmer perceptions: Using sheep scab as an example,” Prev. Vet. Med., vol. 220, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.106052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.106052

A. Malthuf, “Kerentanan Sosial Bencana Gempa Bumi di Kabupaten Klaten,” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 15–21, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/jsp/article/view/45678

B. Setiawan, “Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Pariwisata terhadap Kepuasan Wisatawan,” Jurnal Kepariwisataan Indonesia, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 47–49, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://jurnalpariwisata.org/index.php/jki/article/view/6789

A. Ferdinand, Metode Penelitian Manajemen: Pedoman Penelitian untuk Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, dan Disertasi Ilmu Manajemen. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2014.

S. Santoso, Menguasai Statistik Multivariat dengan SPSS. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo, 2011.

A. Setiawan Prabowo et al., “Analisis Penerimaan Teknologi pada Platform Pasar Banjarwaru dengan Metode Technology Acceptance Model 3,” vol. 16, no. 01, 2025, doi: 10.35970/infotekmesin.v16i1.2559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35970/infotekmesin.v16i1.2559

I. P. Subhaktiyasa, “Evaluasi Model SEM dalam Penelitian Sosial Kebencanaan,” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 45–57, 2024.

R. Proboyekti and D. H. Santosa, “Penerapan Validitas Konvergen dan Diskriminan dalam SEM,” Jurnal Statistika dan Metodologi Penelitian, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 120–135, 2025.

A. Bonfanti and R. Nurjannah, “Pengujian Reliabilitas dan Validitas dalam Model PLS-SEM,” Jurnal Manajemen dan Teknologi, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 223–238, 2024.